linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: Fix no completion event issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 10:38:42 +0000
From:   "yangx.jy@...itsu.com" <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>
To:     "lizhijian@...itsu.com" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>,
        Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Haakon Bugge <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
        Cheng Xu <chengyou@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: Fix no completion event issue

On 2022/6/26 11:29, Li, Zhijian wrote:
> + Xiao
> I do believe regression is high priority,  and I'm very willing to 
> contribute our efforts to improve the stability of RXE :)
> Yang,Xiao and me tried to reproduce the issues in maillist and we also 
> tried to review the their corresponding patches.
> However actually we didn't find a unified way something like bugzilla to 
> maintain the issues and their status, and most of
> them are not reproduced by our local environment. So it's a bit hard for 
> us to review/verify the patches especially for the
> large/complicate patch if we don't have the use cases.
> 
> BTW, IMO we shouldn't stop reviewing other fixes expect recent regressions.

Agreed.

Besides, this patch set looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>

Best Regards,
Xiao Yang
> 
> Zhijian