linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: Fix no completion event issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83cfdf23-7a2d-0776-85ee-7314187e9980@fujitsu.com>
Date:   Sun, 26 Jun 2022 11:29:53 +0800
From:   "Li, Zhijian" <lizhijian@...itsu.com>
To:     Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@...ux.dev>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        "Haakon Bugge" <haakon.bugge@...cle.com>,
        Cheng Xu <chengyou@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Yang, Xiao" <yangx.jy@...itsu.com>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] RDMA/rxe: Fix no completion event issue


on 6/25/2022 8:59 PM, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
>
> 在 2022/6/7 16:32, lizhijian@...itsu.com 写道:
>> Hi Json & Yanjun
>>
>>
>> I know there are still a few regressions on RXE, but i do wish you 
>> could take some time to review these *simple and bugfix* patches
>> They are not related to the regressions.
>
> Now there are some problems from Redhat and other Linux Vendors.
>
> We had better focus on these problems.

+ Xiao
I do believe regression is high priority,  and I'm very willing to contribute our efforts to improve the stability of RXE :)
Yang,Xiao and me tried to reproduce the issues in maillist and we also tried to review the their corresponding patches.
However actually we didn't find a unified way something like bugzilla to maintain the issues and their status, and most of
them are not reproduced by our local environment. So it's a bit hard for us to review/verify the patches especially for the
large/complicate patch if we don't have the use cases.

BTW, IMO we shouldn't stop reviewing other fixes expect recent regressions.

Zhijian

>
> Zhu Yanjun
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Zhijian
>>
>>
>> On 16/05/2022 09:53, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>> Since RXE always posts RDMA_WRITE successfully, it's observed that
>>> no more completion occurs after a few incorrect posts. Actually, it
>>> will block the polling. we can easily reproduce it by the below 
>>> pattern.
>>>
>>> a. post correct RDMA_WRITE
>>> b. poll completion event
>>> while true {
>>>     c. post incorrect RDMA_WRITE(wrong rkey for example)
>>>     d. poll completion event <<<< block after 2 incorrect RDMA_WRITE 
>>> posts
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Li Zhijian (2):
>>>     RDMA/rxe: Update wqe_index for each wqe error completion
>>>     RDMA/rxe: Generate error completion for error requester QP state
>>>
>>>    drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_req.c | 12 +++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>