[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cc136daa-b820-96c3-b5f6-c2c13690f2e0@chromium.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2022 20:41:59 -0700
From: "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joebar@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pazquel dts files
On 6/25/22 7:45 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> * If you want to try to do something like this, it should be in a
> separate patch, probably at the end of the series. Then if people all
> love it then it can be applied and if people don't like it then the
> series can simply be applied without it.
Right now I don't see *any* device tree files for *any* architecture
using #ifdef guards. So introducing them and selling them seems like
more than I want to take on right now, especially because I assume
they've already been proposed before (given that they are such a common
idiom in C/C++).
So in v14 I have just removed the #ifdef guards.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists