linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pazquel dts files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 25 Jun 2022 20:41:59 -0700
From:   "Joseph S. Barrera III" <joebar@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Add pazquel dts files

On 6/25/22 7:45 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> * If you want to try to do something like this, it should be in a
> separate patch, probably at the end of the series. Then if people all
> love it then it can be applied and if people don't like it then the
> series can simply be applied without it.

Right now I don't see *any* device tree files for *any* architecture
using #ifdef guards. So introducing them and selling them seems like
more than I want to take on right now, especially because I assume
they've already been proposed before (given that they are such a common
idiom in C/C++).

So in v14 I have just removed the #ifdef guards.