[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63b7e653-d2d2-c1fc-e43f-1c70ecbe9d04@linaro.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 22:02:25 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: Charles Gorand <charles.gorand@...innov.com>,
Clément Perrochaud <clement.perrochaud@....com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] NFC: nxp-nci: Don't issue a zero length
i2c_master_read()
On 26/06/2022 21:56, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-06-26 21:51, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 26/06/2022 21:42, Michael Walle wrote:
>>> There are packets which doesn't have a payload. In that case, the
>>> second
>>> i2c_master_read() will have a zero length. But because the NFC
>>> controller doesn't have any data left, it will NACK the I2C read and
>>> -ENXIO will be returned. In case there is no payload, just skip the
>>> second i2c master read.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 6be88670fc59 ("NFC: nxp-nci_i2c: Add I2C support to NXP NCI
>>> driver")
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks, I'll reorder the patches in the next version otherwise
> there will likely be a conflict.
Yes.
> That should work with any patch
> tools (i.e. b4), shouldn't it?
You mean - re-ordering should work? Yes, no problem with that.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists