[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220628134115.GA345270-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 07:41:15 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
Cc: wsa@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
pierre-yves.mordret@...s.st.com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com, amelie.delaunay@...s.st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: i2c: st,stm32-i2c: don't mandate a
reset line
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:54:02PM +0200, Alain Volmat wrote:
> Update the dt-bindings of the i2c-stm32 drivers to avoid the
> needs for a reset property in the device-tree.
That is clear from the diff, but why. Some chips don't have a reset?
If so, this should be combined with patch 2 as part of changes needed
for a new version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@...s.st.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> index dccbb18b6dc0..8879144fbbfb 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/st,stm32-i2c.yaml
> @@ -94,7 +94,6 @@ required:
> - compatible
> - reg
> - interrupts
> - - resets
> - clocks
>
> unevaluatedProperties: false
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists