linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PK: runtime: Redefine pm_runtime_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0i=stVf+igcmQmeiFSndOrBhegG1mJjku5OmojPzw5VhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:00:58 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PK: runtime: Redefine pm_runtime_release_supplier()

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:00 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:42:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Instead of passing an extra bool argument to pm_runtime_release_supplier(),
> > make its callers take care of triggering a runtime-suspend of the
> > supplier device as needed.
> >
> > No expected functional impact.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Nice, thanks for cleaning this up.
>
> If you want to take this through your tree:
>         Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>
> But if you want me to take it, please just let me know and I will.

I'll take care of it myself.

Thank you!