linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PK: runtime: Redefine pm_runtime_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 08:00:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PK: runtime: Redefine pm_runtime_release_supplier()

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 08:42:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Instead of passing an extra bool argument to pm_runtime_release_supplier(),
> make its callers take care of triggering a runtime-suspend of the
> supplier device as needed.
> 
> No expected functional impact.
> 
> Suggested-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Nice, thanks for cleaning this up.

If you want to take this through your tree:
	Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

But if you want me to take it, please just let me know and I will.

thanks,

greg k-h