[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220628122442.5e3af503@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:24:42 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
Cc: mcgrof@...nel.org, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, cl@...ux.com,
mbenes@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
void@...ifault.com, atomlin@...mlin.com, allen.lkml@...il.com,
joe@...ches.com, msuchanek@...e.de, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
jason.wessel@...driver.com, pmladek@...e.com, neelx@...hat.com,
daniel.thompson@...aro.org, hch@...radead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 10/14] module: kallsyms: Fix suspicious rcu usage
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 17:21:22 +0100
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com> wrote:
> If I understand correctly, there is absolutely no need to explicitly
> disable preemption in this context. I will use: rcu_read_lock() and
> rcu_read_unlock(), respectively, which will then be suitable for the
> preemptible RCU implementation.
Yes, thank you very much :-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists