[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cgWLPADU66L_5vfoA3NgofTcjCbOgp7DWxA6LyqekV=mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:51:19 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Blake Jones <blakejones@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 0/6] perf tools: A couple of fixes for perf record
--off-cpu (v1)
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 7:40 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 04:13:07PM -0700, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The first patch fixes a build error on old kernels which has
> > task_struct->state field that is renamed to __state. Actually I made
> > a mistake when I wrote the code and assumed new kernel version.
> >
> > The second patch is to prevent invalid sample synthesize by
> > disallowing unsupported sample types.
>
> So I'll pick the first two for perf/urgent and then when that is merged
> into perf/core pick the rest, ok?
Sounds good!
Thanks,
Namhyung
Powered by blists - more mailing lists