linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/181] 5.18.8-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 23:20:30 +0200
From:   Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@....de>
To:     Thomas Backlund <tmb@....nu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/181] 5.18.8-rc1 review

On 28.06.22 22:18, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Den 2022-06-27 kl. 19:38, skrev Ronald Warsow:
>> hallo Greg
>>
>> 5.18.8-rc1
>>
>> compiles (see [1]), boots and runs here on x86_64
>> (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
>>
>> [1]
>> a regression against 5.18.7:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> LD      vmlinux.o
>>     MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(___ksymtab_gpl+tick_nohz_full_setup+0x0):
>> Section mismatch in reference from the variable
>> __ksymtab_tick_nohz_full_setup to the function
>> .init.text:tick_nohz_full_setup()
>> The symbol tick_nohz_full_setup is exported and annotated __init
>> Fix this by removing the __init annotation of tick_nohz_full_setup or
>> drop the export.
>
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
>
>   From 2390095113e98fc52fffe35c5206d30d9efe3f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:22:09 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
>
> --
> Thomas
>

Thanks Thomas
--
Ronald