[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yr1rGxekbuNp1MsU@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 11:21:31 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Thomas Backlund <tmb@....nu>
Cc: Ronald Warsow <rwarsow@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.18 000/181] 5.18.8-rc1 review
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 08:18:34PM +0000, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> Den 2022-06-27 kl. 19:38, skrev Ronald Warsow:
> > hallo Greg
> >
> > 5.18.8-rc1
> >
> > compiles (see [1]), boots and runs here on x86_64
> > (Intel i5-11400, Fedora 36)
> >
> > [1]
> > a regression against 5.18.7:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > LD vmlinux.o
> > MODPOST vmlinux.symvers
> > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(___ksymtab_gpl+tick_nohz_full_setup+0x0):
> > Section mismatch in reference from the variable
> > __ksymtab_tick_nohz_full_setup to the function
> > .init.text:tick_nohz_full_setup()
> > The symbol tick_nohz_full_setup is exported and annotated __init
> > Fix this by removing the __init annotation of tick_nohz_full_setup or
> > drop the export.
>
>
> Should be fixed by:
>
>
> From 2390095113e98fc52fffe35c5206d30d9efe3f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 12:22:09 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] tick/nohz: unexport __init-annotated tick_nohz_full_setup()
Great, now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists