lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:10:38 -0400
From:   Joe Simmons-Talbott <joetalbott@...il.com>
To:     Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: checkpatch.pl bug for EXPORT_SYMBOL when struct initialization
 follows define

I believe I've found a bug in checkpatch.pl where an EXPORT_SYMBOL for
an initialized struct following a simple #define without an intervening
blank line falsely reports that EXPORT_SYMBOL doesn't follow the symbol
definition.  Here's an example:

	#define SOMETHING_ELSE 1
	struct blah foo = {
		.a = 1
	};
	EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo);

You can see from the debug print that the full statement has not been
identified.

	FOO A<+EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo);> stat<+      .a = 1
	 };> name<foo>

Unfortunately my perl skills were not sufficient to find a fix.

Thanks,
Joe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ