[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrysFU0fP7X1wkBd@shikoro>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:46:29 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com,
andrew@...people.com, mhoffman@...htlink.com, khali@...ux-fr.org,
peda@...ntia.se
Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:13:44PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> Resend due to the fact that the i2c list no longer accepts replys on the
> old patch-set. Comments not addressed yet.
>
> The first patch is mostly a prerequisite for the second one. It only
> moves the i2c_recover_bus() out of the actual transfer function. This
> helps the second patch disable the controller before using GPIO
> recovery. The second patch will keep the controller enabled when a
> transfer occurs. Before using GPIO recovery, the controller must be
> disabled, to ignore potential glitches. However, the controller must be
> enabled for HW recovery (bus CLEAR command). The third and last patch
> adds advanced digital filtering support for SAMA5D4. The TWI IP found in
> SAMA5D4 supports advanced digital filtering, even if, at the moment of
> this patch, the SAMA5D4 datasheet does not mention it.
So, can you guys read this mail? It should be possible somehow that I
can read your remarks to my remarks, no?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists