linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:41:53 +0200
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>,
        <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>, <andrew@...people.com>,
        <mhoffman@...htlink.com>, <khali@...ux-fr.org>, <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com>
CC:     Cristian Birsan <Cristian.Birsan@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates

Hi Wolfram,

On 29/06/2022 at 21:46, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:13:44PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
>> Resend due to the fact that the i2c list no longer accepts replys on the
>> old patch-set. Comments not addressed yet.
>>
>> The first patch is mostly a prerequisite for the second one. It only
>> moves the i2c_recover_bus() out of the actual transfer function. This
>> helps the second patch disable the controller before using GPIO
>> recovery. The second patch will keep the controller enabled when a
>> transfer occurs. Before using GPIO recovery, the controller must be
>> disabled, to ignore potential glitches. However, the controller must be
>> enabled for HW recovery (bus CLEAR command). The third and last patch
>> adds advanced digital filtering support for SAMA5D4. The TWI IP found in
>> SAMA5D4 supports advanced digital filtering, even if, at the moment of
>> this patch, the SAMA5D4 datasheet does not mention it.
 >
> So, can you guys read this mail? It should be possible somehow that I
> can read your remarks to my remarks, no?

Codrin is not with Microchip anymore and we have to re-distribute the 
maintenance of this driver internally. His email address will probably 
"bounce" soon.

So, forgive us if there's a lack of response for some time ;-)

Best regards,
   Nicolas

-- 
Nicolas Ferre