lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <321d069a-0db3-6abd-c25e-4da46f361bd7@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:44:29 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Cleanup run_wrapper, fix x-ref

On 6/29/22 11:06, David Gow wrote:
> +This means that for most architectures, running under qemu is as simple as:
> +
> +.. code-block:: bash
> +
> +	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch=x86_64
> +
> +When cross-compiling, we'll likely need to specify a different toolchain, for
> +example:
> +
> +.. code-block:: bash
> +
> +	./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run \
> +		--arch=s390 \
> +		--cross_compile=s390x-linux-gnu-
> +

nit: s/we'll/you'll/

Otherwise looks OK.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ