[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be793e51-0d89-7afd-e122-ec929a1130e9@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:49:26 +0100
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, rafael@...nel.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
alignment
Hi guys,
Are there any objections to these patches?
On 6/22/22 15:57, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a patch set which changes Energy Model power values scale to
> micro-Watts. It also upgrades the SCMI performance layer + scmi-cpufreq
> driver to leverage the SCMI v3.1 spec and process micro-Watts power values
> coming from FW. The higher precision in EM power field solves an issue
> of a rounding error, which then can be misinterpreted as 'inefficient OPP'.
> An example rounding issue calculation is present in patch 1/4 description.
>
> Regards,
> Lukasz Luba
>
> Lukasz Luba (4):
> PM: EM: convert power field to micro-Watts precision and align drivers
> Documentation: EM: Switch to micro-Watts scale
> firmware: arm_scmi: Get detailed power scale from perf
> cpufreq: scmi: Support the power scale in micro-Watts in SCMI v3.1
>
> Documentation/power/energy-model.rst | 14 +++---
> drivers/cpufreq/mediatek-cpufreq-hw.c | 7 +--
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 15 ++++++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 18 +++++---
> drivers/opp/of.c | 15 ++++---
> drivers/powercap/dtpm_cpu.c | 5 +--
> drivers/thermal/cpufreq_cooling.c | 13 +++++-
> drivers/thermal/devfreq_cooling.c | 19 ++++++--
> include/linux/energy_model.h | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 8 +++-
> kernel/power/energy_model.c | 31 ++++++++-----
> 11 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
have support on our roadmap.
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists