linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220629095302.bi3xx6yicsnjeff7@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:23:02 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, rafael@...nel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
 alignment

On 29-06-22, 10:49, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
> the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
> that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
> this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
> have support on our roadmap.

Should I pick them and merge via PM tree ?

-- 
viresh