linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:00:22 +0100
From:   Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, rafael@...nel.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, nm@...com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
 alignment

Hi Viresh,

On 6/29/22 10:53, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 29-06-22, 10:49, Lukasz Luba wrote:
>> I would like to move forward with the micro-Watts in
>> the Energy Model. We have feedback from our partners
>> that this is a limitation. Also, as you can see
>> this uW is part of the new SCMI spec, which we
>> have support on our roadmap.
> 
> Should I pick them and merge via PM tree ?
> 

Thanks for fast response. It would be great.

I have 2 ACKs from Sudeep for the SCMI part,
but I don't know the status e.g. of DTPM
current work which is using the EM milli-Watts
and does conversion to uW internally.
I hope, I won't make issues to Daniel's work with this
change.