linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1 alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:31:48 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, amitk@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        rafael@...nel.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, nm@...com,
        sboyd@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, cristian.marussi@....com,
        matthias.bgg@...il.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Energy Model power in micro-Watts and SCMI v3.1
 alignment

On 29-06-22, 11:00, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> Thanks for fast response. It would be great.
> 
> I have 2 ACKs from Sudeep for the SCMI part,
> but I don't know the status e.g. of DTPM
> current work which is using the EM milli-Watts
> and does conversion to uW internally.
> I hope, I won't make issues to Daniel's work with this
> change.

Daniel, do you have any objections to this ?

-- 
viresh