linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: adp5588: sort header inclusion alphabetically

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 11:59:31 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Sa, Nuno" <Nuno.Sa@...log.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: adp5588: sort header inclusion alphabetically

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 10:50 AM Hennerich, Michael
<Michael.Hennerich@...log.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Sent: Dienstag, 28. Juni 2022 21:39
> > To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>; linux-
> > gpio@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc: Hennerich, Michael <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>; Linus Walleij
> > <linus.walleij@...aro.org>; Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
> > Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] gpio: adp5588: sort header inclusion alphabetically
> >
> > Sort header inclusion alphabetically.
>
> Thanks for the patches, they look good.
> However, Nuno is currently working on getting the irqchip support into the
> adp5588 input driver. In his patch series this driver is going away.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/YpMCh1Xje+jsny8j@google.com/

While that work is ongoing, and most likely won't make v5.20-rc1, for
the v5.20-rc1 I think my patches are good to go to avoid a bad (or
rather very old) example on how to do GPIO drivers. What do you think?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko