linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Cleanup run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tu83tyqx.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
Date:   Wed, 29 Jun 2022 06:55:50 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
        Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Documentation: kunit: Cleanup run_wrapper, fix x-ref

David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> writes:

> Thanks. The rest of this document is using "we" rather than "you", so
> I used "we'll" for consistency. If "you" is preferred generally, it'd
> be best to change it throughout the document (probably in a separate
> patch).

Nobody has ever tried to articulate a wider policy on first or
second-person usage for kernel docs, so far as I know, and I think
that's just fine.  We have far bigger things to worry about before we
get concerned about consistency at that level.

Thanks,

jon