linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/adreno: Fix up formatting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <78bfe8bd-b07e-5a53-156b-ad8b24829f29@quicinc.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 20:47:46 +0530
From:   Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        <~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht>
CC:     <martin.botka@...ainline.org>,
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, <jamipkettunen@...ainline.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/adreno: Fix up formatting

On 5/28/2022 10:22 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 18:03 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> Leading spaces are not something checkpatch likes, and it says so when
>> they are present. Use tabs consistently to indent function body and
>> unwrap a 83-char-long line, as 100 is cool nowadays.
> unassociated trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
> []
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a420(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>   
>>   static inline int adreno_is_a430(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>   {
>> -       return gpu->revn == 430;
>> +	return gpu->revn == 430;
>>   }
> looks like these could/should return bool
But this is just a format fix.

>
>>   static inline int adreno_is_a506(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a540(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>   
>>   static inline int adreno_is_a618(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>>   {
>> -       return gpu->revn == 618;
>> +	return gpu->revn == 618;
>>   }
> etc...

Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>


-Akhil.