[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f79d8e7-0035-cfb0-d612-3e1c7f243f22@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 08:41:39 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, joro@...tes.org,
will@...nel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linuxarm@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] scsi: core: Cap shost max_sectors according to DMA
limits only once
On 6/30/22 21:08, John Garry wrote:
> The shost->max_sectors is repeatedly capped according to the host DMA
> mapping limit for each sdev in __scsi_init_queue(). This is unnecessary, so
> set only once when adding the host.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 5 +++++
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 4 ----
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> index 8352f90d997d..d04bd2c7c9f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> @@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ int scsi_add_host_with_dma(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct device *dev,
>
> shost->dma_dev = dma_dev;
>
> + if (dma_dev->dma_mask) {
> + shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
> + dma_max_mapping_size(dma_dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> + }
Nit: you could remove the curly brackets... But it being a multi-line
statement, having them is OK too I think.
> +
> error = scsi_mq_setup_tags(shost);
> if (error)
> goto fail;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 6ffc9e4258a8..6ce8acea322a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1884,10 +1884,6 @@ void __scsi_init_queue(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct request_queue *q)
> blk_queue_max_integrity_segments(q, shost->sg_prot_tablesize);
> }
>
> - if (dev->dma_mask) {
> - shost->max_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
> - dma_max_mapping_size(dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> - }
> blk_queue_max_hw_sectors(q, shost->max_sectors);
> blk_queue_segment_boundary(q, shost->dma_boundary);
> dma_set_seg_boundary(dev, shost->dma_boundary);
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists