linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 10:36:03 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Merge Intel PMIC core to
 crc

Hi,

On 6/30/22 10:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:01 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 4:36 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 02:08:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 160 -----------------------------
>>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.h |  25 -----
>>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c  | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>  4 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
>>>>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you submit this again with the -M flag please.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is done with this flag. Basically for the last several years I do my
>>>>> submissions with that flag.
>>>>
>>>> Odd.  I thought -M only showed diff for the changes.
>>>
>>> It's exactly what happens here in this patch. What did I miss?
>>>
>>> Note here is not renaming, but merging contents of one file (actually
>>> two files) into another. What you are talking about is probably -D,
>>> but AFAIR Git (at least that time) can't catch up deleted files from
>>> the mbox format. That's why I do not use -D for submissions.
>>
>> Ah yes, that's probably it then.
>>
>> From a quick look at the diff (I missed the 2 "--" at the end), it
>> looked like this was a rename.  In which case -M won't do anything
>> useful here.  I'll have to brain grep the differences instead.
> 
> Please do, it will be good to have this double checked.

Note that I already did a manual compare of the moved code blocks
to check that they were not changed before giving my Reviewed-by.

Regards,

Hans