linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:45:53 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_crc: Merge Intel PMIC core to
 crc

On Thu, 30 Jun 2022, Hans de Goede wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 6/30/22 10:07, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 10:01 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 4:36 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 02:08:39PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2022, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c | 160 -----------------------------
> >>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.h |  25 -----
> >>>>>>>  drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_crc.c  | 162 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >>>>>>>  4 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 193 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
> >>>>>>>  delete mode 100644 drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.h
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Can you submit this again with the -M flag please.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is done with this flag. Basically for the last several years I do my
> >>>>> submissions with that flag.
> >>>>
> >>>> Odd.  I thought -M only showed diff for the changes.
> >>>
> >>> It's exactly what happens here in this patch. What did I miss?
> >>>
> >>> Note here is not renaming, but merging contents of one file (actually
> >>> two files) into another. What you are talking about is probably -D,
> >>> but AFAIR Git (at least that time) can't catch up deleted files from
> >>> the mbox format. That's why I do not use -D for submissions.
> >>
> >> Ah yes, that's probably it then.
> >>
> >> From a quick look at the diff (I missed the 2 "--" at the end), it
> >> looked like this was a rename.  In which case -M won't do anything
> >> useful here.  I'll have to brain grep the differences instead.
> > 
> > Please do, it will be good to have this double checked.
> 
> Note that I already did a manual compare of the moved code blocks
> to check that they were not changed before giving my Reviewed-by.

Super, thanks Hans.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Principal Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog