linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] kbuild: fix sub directory output build of kselftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <95a3eb80-645e-a1b9-8373-46b1ad015e96@collabora.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:44:40 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc:     usama.anjum@...labora.com, Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, guillaume.tucker@...labora.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kbuild: fix sub directory output build of kselftests

Hi Masahiro,

>>> Please resend cc'ing linux-kselftest
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -- Shuah
>>
>>
>> Please do not send this any more.
>> This part is good as is.
I'm confused. Have you accepted or rejected the patch?

>>
> 
> + linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> 
> The reason I suggested resending cc'ing linux-kselftest is because
> this fixes a kselftest problem.
> 
> I am assuming this patch will go through kbuild
> 
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>


-- 
Muhammad Usama Anjum