linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] kbuild: fix sub directory output build of kselftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 Jul 2022 19:07:50 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kbingham@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, guillaume.tucker@...labora.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kbuild: fix sub directory output build of kselftests

On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:44 PM Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Masahiro,
>
> >>> Please resend cc'ing linux-kselftest
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>> -- Shuah
> >>
> >>
> >> Please do not send this any more.
> >> This part is good as is.
> I'm confused. Have you accepted or rejected the patch?

Sorry for confusion.
Rejected.



>
> >>
> >
> > + linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > The reason I suggested resending cc'ing linux-kselftest is because
> > this fixes a kselftest problem.
> >
> > I am assuming this patch will go through kbuild
> >
> > Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Usama Anjum



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada