[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d615e7a0-8a7e-7e24-6c87-a8bf034ecb53@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 19:24:32 -0700
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, zhangjinhao2@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/histograms: Simplify create_hist_fields()
On 6/29/22 6:31 PM, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> When I look into implements of create_hist_fields(), I think there can be
> following two simplifications:
> 1. If something wrong happened in parse_var_defs(), free_var_defs() would
> have been called in it, so no need goto free again after calling it;
> 2. After calling create_key_fields(), regardless of the value of 'ret', it
> then always runs into 'out: ', so the judge of 'ret' is redundant.
>
> No functional changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> index 2784951e0fc8..832c4ccf41ab 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_hist.c
> @@ -4454,7 +4454,7 @@ static int create_hist_fields(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
>
> ret = parse_var_defs(hist_data);
> if (ret)
> - goto out;
> + return ret;
>
> ret = create_val_fields(hist_data, file);
> if (ret)
> @@ -4465,8 +4465,7 @@ static int create_hist_fields(struct hist_trigger_data *hist_data,
> goto out;
>
> ret = create_key_fields(hist_data, file);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out;
> +
> out:
> free_var_defs(hist_data);
Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists