[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yr92OngNsEOxszUA@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 15:33:30 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@...lia.com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Joe Fradley <joefradley@...gle.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] selftest: Taint kernel when test module loaded
On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 04:47:44PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> Make any kselftest test module (using the kselftest_module framework)
> taint the kernel with TAINT_TEST on module load.
>
> Note that several selftests use kernel modules which are not based on
> the kselftest_module framework, and so will not automatically taint the
> kernel.
>
> This can be done in two ways:
> - Moving the module to the tools/testing directory. All modules under
> this directory will taint the kernel.
> - Adding the 'test' module property with:
> MODULE_INFO(test, "Y")
This just needs to be documented somewhere other than a commit log.
Otherwise I am not sure how we can be sure it will catch on.
> Similarly, selftests which do not load modules into the kernel generally
> should not taint the kernel (or possibly should only do so on failure),
> as it's assumed that testing from user-space should be safe. Regardless,
> they can write to /proc/sys/kernel/tainted if required.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
Looks good otherwise!
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Do we want this to go through selftest / kunit / modules tree?
Happy for it to through any. I can't predict a conflict.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists