| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <165660183471.15455.10860273694768857101.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2022 15:10:34 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Dietmar Eggemann" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout
find_energy_efficient_cpu()
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 9b340131a4bcf6d0a282a2bdcd8ca268a74da709
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9b340131a4bcf6d0a282a2bdcd8ca268a74da709
Author: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:04:12 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 09:17:47 +02:00
sched/fair: Use the same cpumask per-PD throughout find_energy_efficient_cpu()
The Perf Domain (PD) cpumask (struct em_perf_domain.cpus) stays
invariant after Energy Model creation, i.e. it is not updated after
CPU hotplug operations.
That's why the PD mask is used in conjunction with the cpu_online_mask
(or Sched Domain cpumask). Thereby the cpu_online_mask is fetched
multiple times (in compute_energy()) during a run-queue selection
for a task.
cpu_online_mask may change during this time which can lead to wrong
energy calculations.
To be able to avoid this, use the select_rq_mask per-cpu cpumask to
create a cpumask out of PD cpumask and cpu_online_mask and pass it
through the function calls of the EAS run-queue selection path.
The PD cpumask for max_spare_cap_cpu/compute_prev_delta selection
(find_energy_efficient_cpu()) is now ANDed not only with the SD mask
but also with the cpu_online_mask. This is fine since this cpumask
has to be in syc with the one used for energy computation
(compute_energy()).
An exclusive cpuset setup with at least one asymmetric CPU capacity
island (hence the additional AND with the SD cpumask) is the obvious
exception here.
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220621090414.433602-6-vdonnefort@google.com
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index e3f7501..46d6692 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6709,14 +6709,14 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_without(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
* task.
*/
static long
-compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
+compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct cpumask *cpus,
+ struct perf_domain *pd)
{
- struct cpumask *pd_mask = perf_domain_span(pd);
unsigned long max_util = 0, sum_util = 0, cpu_cap;
int cpu;
- cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
- cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(pd_mask));
+ cpu_cap = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(cpus));
+ cpu_cap -= arch_scale_thermal_pressure(cpumask_first(cpus));
/*
* The capacity state of CPUs of the current rd can be driven by CPUs
@@ -6727,7 +6727,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
* If an entire pd is outside of the current rd, it will not appear in
* its pd list and will not be accounted by compute_energy().
*/
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, pd_mask, cpu_online_mask) {
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpus) {
unsigned long util_freq = cpu_util_next(cpu, p, dst_cpu);
unsigned long cpu_util, util_running = util_freq;
struct task_struct *tsk = NULL;
@@ -6814,6 +6814,7 @@ compute_energy(struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, struct perf_domain *pd)
*/
static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
{
+ struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_rq_mask);
unsigned long prev_delta = ULONG_MAX, best_delta = ULONG_MAX;
struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd;
int cpu, best_energy_cpu = prev_cpu, target = -1;
@@ -6848,7 +6849,9 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
unsigned long base_energy_pd;
int max_spare_cap_cpu = -1;
- for_each_cpu_and(cpu, perf_domain_span(pd), sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+ cpumask_and(cpus, perf_domain_span(pd), cpu_online_mask);
+
+ for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpus, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
continue;
@@ -6885,12 +6888,12 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
continue;
/* Compute the 'base' energy of the pd, without @p */
- base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, pd);
+ base_energy_pd = compute_energy(p, -1, cpus, pd);
base_energy += base_energy_pd;
/* Evaluate the energy impact of using prev_cpu. */
if (compute_prev_delta) {
- prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, pd);
+ prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, cpus, pd);
if (prev_delta < base_energy_pd)
goto unlock;
prev_delta -= base_energy_pd;
@@ -6899,7 +6902,8 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu)
/* Evaluate the energy impact of using max_spare_cap_cpu. */
if (max_spare_cap_cpu >= 0) {
- cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, pd);
+ cur_delta = compute_energy(p, max_spare_cap_cpu, cpus,
+ pd);
if (cur_delta < base_energy_pd)
goto unlock;
cur_delta -= base_energy_pd;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists