lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df94b5f9-764f-6334-f142-51773c3911bd@csgroup.eu>
Date:   Sun, 3 Jul 2022 17:58:15 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
CC:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>, "mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
        "void@...ifault.com" <void@...ifault.com>,
        "atomlin@...mlin.com" <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
        "allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
        "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
        "msuchanek@...e.de" <msuchanek@...e.de>,
        "oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        "jason.wessel@...driver.com" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        "pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "daniel.thompson@...aro.org" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
        Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 09/14] module: Move kallsyms support into a separate
 file



Le 03/07/2022 à 16:13, Steven Rostedt a écrit :
> On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 14:57:08 +0100
> Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I completely agree and noted.
>>
>>> You even stated "no functional change" which was a lie. Converting
>>> strlcpy() to strscpy() *is* a functional change!
>>
>> Understood.
> 
> Sorry about being harsh. It's something that was engrained in me when
> doing kernel development, and something I found useful for all software
> development.
> 
> Honestly, the hardest thing about kernel development is the review
> process. The easier we can make reviewing, the better the code will be.
> 

I'm probably the one who misleaded Aaron.

When I started submitting Kernel patches years ago, I was given those 
guidelines:
- Always submit checkpatch clean patches.
- Try to never modify the same line of code twice in a series.

Which implied to always fix codying Style while changing or moving code.

Christophe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ