| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvi-CT6c7qqTPh7-Vqr-2gGdX6G1FP52hqQFL3q0r=tOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 15:14:07 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V4] virtio-net: fix the race between refill work and close
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 3:03 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 02:32:45PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 2:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 12:19:48PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > We try using cancel_delayed_work_sync() to prevent the work from
> > > > enabling NAPI. This is insufficient since we don't disable the source
> > > > of the refill work scheduling. This means an NAPI poll callback after
> > > > cancel_delayed_work_sync() can schedule the refill work then can
> > > > re-enable the NAPI that leads to use-after-free [1].
> > > >
> > > > Since the work can enable NAPI, we can't simply disable NAPI before
> > > > calling cancel_delayed_work_sync(). So fix this by introducing a
> > > > dedicated boolean to control whether or not the work could be
> > > > scheduled from NAPI.
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > > ==================================================================
> > > > BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > > > Read of size 2 at addr ffff88810562c92e by task kworker/2:1/42
> > > >
> > > > CPU: 2 PID: 42 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 5.19.0-rc1+ #480
> > > > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.16.0-0-gd239552ce722-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
> > > > Workqueue: events refill_work
> > > > Call Trace:
> > > > <TASK>
> > > > dump_stack_lvl+0x34/0x44
> > > > print_report.cold+0xbb/0x6ac
> > > > ? _printk+0xad/0xde
> > > > ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > > > kasan_report+0xa8/0x130
> > > > ? refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > > > refill_work+0x43/0xd4
> > > > process_one_work+0x43d/0x780
> > > > worker_thread+0x2a0/0x6f0
> > > > ? process_one_work+0x780/0x780
> > > > kthread+0x167/0x1a0
> > > > ? kthread_exit+0x50/0x50
> > > > ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > > > </TASK>
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: b2baed69e605c ("virtio_net: set/cancel work on ndo_open/ndo_stop")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > Changes since V3:
> > > > - rebase to -net
> > > > Changes since V2:
> > > > - use spin_unlock()/lock_bh() in open/stop to synchronize with bh
> > > > Changes since V1:
> > > > - Tweak the changelog
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > index 356cf8dd4164..68430d7923ac 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > @@ -251,6 +251,12 @@ struct virtnet_info {
> > > > /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */
> > > > bool affinity_hint_set;
> > > >
> > > > + /* Is refill work enabled? */
> > >
> > > refilling enabled
> >
> > I think it should be reill work, we try refill first, if fail we
> > schedule the work:
> >
> > if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> > schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> >
> > Thanks
>
> maybe "delayed refill"? It's not "work" it's a work struct.
> I'm trying to be consistent with:
> /* Work struct for refilling if we run low on memory. */
> struct delayed_work refill;
Ok, that's fine.
Will post a new version.
Thanks
>
>
> > >
> > > > + bool refill_work_enabled;
> > >
> > >
> > > refill_work -> refill?
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > + /* The lock to synchronize the access to refill_work_enabled */
> > >
> > > .. and refill
> > >
> > > And maybe put these field near the refill field.
> > >
> > > > + spinlock_t refill_lock;
> > > > +
> > > > /* CPU hotplug instances for online & dead */
> > > > struct hlist_node node;
> > > > struct hlist_node node_dead;
> > > > @@ -348,6 +354,20 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > > > return p;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void enable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > > > +{
> > > > + spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > + vi->refill_work_enabled = true;
> > > > + spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void disable_refill_work(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> > > > +{
> > > > + spin_lock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > + vi->refill_work_enabled = false;
> > > > + spin_unlock_bh(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
> > > > struct virtqueue *vq)
> > > > {
> > > > @@ -1527,8 +1547,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
> > > > - if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> > > > - schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> > > > + spin_lock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > + if (vi->refill_work_enabled)
> > > > + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> > > > + spin_unlock(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > > + }
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > u64_stats_update_begin(&rq->stats.syncp);
> > > > @@ -1651,6 +1675,8 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > int i, err;
> > > >
> > > > + enable_refill_work(vi);
> > > > +
> > > > for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> > > > if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> > > > /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> > > > @@ -2033,6 +2059,8 @@ static int virtnet_close(struct net_device *dev)
> > > > struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > + /* Make sure NAPI doesn't schedule refill work */
> > > > + disable_refill_work(vi);
> > > > /* Make sure refill_work doesn't re-enable napi! */
> > > > cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> > > >
> > > > @@ -2792,6 +2820,8 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > >
> > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > >
> > > > + enable_refill_work(vi);
> > > > +
> > > > if (netif_running(vi->dev)) {
> > > > err = virtnet_open(vi->dev);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > @@ -3535,6 +3565,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > vdev->priv = vi;
> > > >
> > > > INIT_WORK(&vi->config_work, virtnet_config_changed_work);
> > > > + spin_lock_init(&vi->refill_lock);
> > > >
> > > > /* If we can receive ANY GSO packets, we must allocate large ones. */
> > > > if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists