[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1482ae3d-7841-beca-3fa4-7e2519944086@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 09:15:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-krzk tree with the qcom tree
On 04/07/2022 04:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the dt-krzk tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>
> between commit:
>
> bbd5a6891908 ("dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document sda660 SoC and ifc6560 board")
>
> from the qcom tree and commit:
>
> 4fc3efba3205 ("dt-bindings: arm: qcom: add missing SDM630 board compatibles")
>
> from the dt-krzk tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
Thanks, looks good.
Bjorn,
There is more and more of dt-bindings work pending on my board patchset
(part of this pull). I think we talked that you will pull it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists