lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMusb+SaQOEw_deYyT-nB43Jvmy8W1Bd5gJrpcgvtMOTiEaoNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:35:34 +0200
From:   Vlad Dronov <vdronov@...hat.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: include/crypto/chacha.h:100: undefined reference to `chacha_crypt_arch'

Hi,

On Sun, Jul 3, 2022 at 12:51 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> ...
> config: s390-buildonly-randconfig-r005-20220703 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220703/202207030630.6SZVkrWf-lkp@intel.com/config)
> ...
>    s390-linux-ld: lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.o: in function `chacha_crypt':
> >> include/crypto/chacha.h:100: undefined reference to `chacha_crypt_arch'
> >> s390-linux-ld: include/crypto/chacha.h:100: undefined reference to `chacha_crypt_arch'
> ...
> Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
>    WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305
>    Depends on (CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA && (CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 && CRYPTO

Ok, this is either weird or I do not understand how the Kconfig system works.

What I look at is CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305 definition:

[ lib/crypto/Kconfig ]
config CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305
    tristate "ChaCha20-Poly1305 AEAD support (8-byte nonce library version)"
    depends on CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA
    depends on CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305
    depends on CRYPTO

and this test's random config (s390-buildonly-randconfig-r005-20220703):

$ grep -e CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305 -e CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA
-e CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 -e CRYPTO= config
CONFIG_CRYPTO=y
CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA=m
CONFIG_CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305=y
// missing CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 implies =n (I guess?)

I'm following the canonical "Kconfig Language" doc (
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/kbuild/kconfig-language.html )
which states:

> - dependencies: “depends on” <expr>
> This defines a dependency for this menu entry. If multiple dependencies are defined, they are connected with ‘&&’.

and

>         '!' <expr>                           (6)
>         <expr> '&&' <expr>                   (7)
>         <expr> '||' <expr>                   (8)
>
> 6. Returns the result of (2-/expr/).
> 7. Returns the result of min(/expr/, /expr/).
> 8. Returns the result of max(/expr/, /expr/).
> An expression can have a value of ‘n’, ‘m’ or ‘y’ (or 0, 1, 2 respectively for calculations).

So calculating:

(CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_CHACHA) &&
(CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305 || !CRYPTO_ARCH_HAVE_LIB_POLY1305) &&
CRYPTO

I find it equal to:

(m || !m) && (n || !n) && y  =>  m && y && y  =>  m

So CRYPTO_LIB_CHACHA20POLY1305 should be no higher than M, but it is
=Y in a config file => weird :\ (or me wrong somewhere).

WDYT?

Best regards,
Vladis Dronov | Red Hat, Inc. | The Core Kernel | Senior Software Engineer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ