[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YsL6XCWmgiIeLKJ9@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 16:34:04 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@...ypsium.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
ardb@...nel.org, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
rafael@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
daniel.gutson@...ypsium.com, hughsient@...il.com,
alex.bazhaniuk@...ypsium.com, alison.schofield@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 9/9] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto
capabilities
On Mon, Jul 04, 2022 at 10:58:33AM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote:
> Show in each node in sysfs if its memory is able to do be encrypted by
> the CPU; on EFI systems: if all its memory is marked with
> EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO in the EFI memory map.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@...ypsium.com>
> ---
> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-node | 10 ++++++++++
> drivers/base/node.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-node
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-node b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-node
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..0e95420bd7c5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-node
> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> +What: /sys/devices/system/node/nodeX/crypto_capable
> +Date: April 2022
> +Contact: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@...ypsium.com>
> +Users: fwupd (https://fwupd.org)
> +Description:
> + This value is 1 if all system memory in this node is
> + capable of being protected with the CPU's memory
> + cryptographic capabilities. It is 0 otherwise.
> + On EFI systems the node will be marked with
> + EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO.
Where will such a node be "marked"? I do not understand this last
sentence, sorry, can you please reword this?
And why is EFI an issue here at all?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists