lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfLxOd7kVTzFmjkxfSOssrFaW=ih=eNVeXUUUWTLv=oew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 5 Jul 2022 19:18:04 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: pxa: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare() in pxa_gpio_probe()

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 3:05 PM Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Add clk_disable_unprepare() on error path in pxa_gpio_probe().
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yuan Can <yuancan@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> index c7fbfa3ae43b..08963975dd1b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pxa.c
> @@ -676,6 +676,7 @@ static int pxa_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         /* Initialize GPIO chips */
>         ret = pxa_init_gpio_chip(pchip, pxa_last_gpio + 1, gpio_reg_base);
>         if (ret) {
> +               clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
>                 clk_put(clk);
>                 return ret;
>         }
> --
> 2.17.1
>

Hi Yuan!

This patch is not wrong but it's incomplete. A quick glance at the
driver is telling me that once probe succeeded, nobody ever disables
or releases the clock on remove. There's no remove callback and no
devm action set for that. Please take a look at the patch I just sent.

Bart

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ