[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTRkQthkB0DJaN790PK5tNuKnrAtSy8rK8cpRRpc-nY_KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 07:56:14 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wei Fu <wefu@...hat.com>,
Christoph Muellner <cmuellner@...ux.com>,
Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Nick Kossifidis <mick@....forth.gr>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] of: also handle dma-noncoherent in of_dma_is_coherent()
Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
On Wed, Jul 6, 2022 at 6:47 AM Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> of_dma_is_coherent() currently expects the architecture to be
> non-coherent and some devices being coherent getting marked
> as such with the dma-coherent devicetree property.
>
> For PowerPC CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT was added which currently
> makes of_dma_is_coherent() always return true but doesn't handle
> the case of the architecture being coherent but some devices not.
>
> So modify the function to also check for dma-noncoherent and
> set a suitable default return value. If CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT
> is set the value starts with true and finding dma-noncoherent will
> set it to false and without CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT, the
> behaviour is reversed.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> ---
> drivers/of/address.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
> index 94f017d808c4..96f0a12e507c 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/address.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/address.c
> @@ -1045,26 +1045,29 @@ phys_addr_t __init of_dma_get_max_cpu_address(struct device_node *np)
> *
> * It returns true if "dma-coherent" property was found
> * for this device in the DT, or if DMA is coherent by
> - * default for OF devices on the current platform.
> + * default for OF devices on the current platform and no
> + * "dma-noncoherent" property was found for this device.
> */
> bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device_node *node;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT))
> - return true;
> + bool is_coherent = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT);
>
> node = of_node_get(np);
>
> while (node) {
> if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent")) {
> - of_node_put(node);
> - return true;
> + is_coherent = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-noncoherent")) {
> + is_coherent = false;
> + break;
> }
> node = of_get_next_dma_parent(node);
> }
> of_node_put(node);
> - return false;
> + return is_coherent;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_dma_is_coherent);
>
> --
> 2.35.1
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
Powered by blists - more mailing lists