[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220705103549.GI9951@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 12:35:49 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>
Cc: martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com, hauke@...ke-m.de,
git@...ger-koblitz.de, sander@...nheule.net,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: smp-mt: enable all hardware interrupts on second
VPE
On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 09:07:05PM +0200, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski wrote:
> This patch is needed to handle interrupts by the second VPE on
> the Lantiq xRX200, xRX300 and xRX330 SoCs. In these chips, 32 ICU
> interrupts are connected to each hardware line. The SoC supports
> a total of 160 interrupts. Currently changing smp_affinity to the
> second VPE hangs interrupts.
>
> This problem affects multithreaded SoCs with a custom interrupt
> controller. Chips with 1004Kc core and newer use the MIPS GIC.
>
> Also CC'ed Birger Koblitz and Sander Vanheule. Both are working
> on support for Realtek RTL930x chips with 34Kc core and Birger
> has added a patch in OpenWRT that also enables all interrupt
> lines. So it looks like this patch is useful for more SoCs.
>
> Tested on lantiq xRX200 and xRX330.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>
> ---
> arch/mips/kernel/smp-mt.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-mt.c b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-mt.c
> index 5f04a0141068..f21cd0eb1fa7 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/smp-mt.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/smp-mt.c
> @@ -113,8 +113,7 @@ static void vsmp_init_secondary(void)
> STATUSF_IP4 | STATUSF_IP5 |
> STATUSF_IP6 | STATUSF_IP7);
> else
> - change_c0_status(ST0_IM, STATUSF_IP0 | STATUSF_IP1 |
> - STATUSF_IP6 | STATUSF_IP7);
> + set_c0_status(ST0_IM);
> }
just blindly enabling all interrupts doesn't sound like a brilliant
idea even when if works on some Lantiq platforms (probably because
their interrupt controller prevents issuing unwanted interrupts).
But not all smp-mt platforms are Lantiq. If some CPU interrupts
need to be enabled a clean interrupt controller setup with hierarchy
irq domains is IMHO the correct approach,
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists