[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <62c56628.1c69fb81.aea0.a137@mx.google.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 12:21:55 +0200
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] clk: qcom: clk-rpm: convert to parent_data API
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 11:27:34AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 23:56, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > Convert clk-rpm driver to parent_data API and change parent names to cxo
> > and pxo instead of the board variant as pxo_board is an ancient name and
> > pxo should be used instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> > index a18811c38018..d45a8b0fc97c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rpm.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
> > #define QCOM_RPM_SCALING_ENABLE_ID 0x2
> > #define QCOM_RPM_XO_MODE_ON 0x2
> >
> > +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_pxo[] = {
> > + { .fw_name = "pxo", .name = "pxo" },
>
> This means that the core clock would look for the DT clock named 'pxo'
> with the fallback to the global clock named 'pxo'. Fallback is
> required to keep compatibility with older DT files, not having the
> clocks/clock-names properties.
> For all other platforms we were using as a fallback the 'pxo_board'
> clock (defined in the DT) rather than the 'pxo' (hackily injected by
> the gcc driver).
> I'd suggest following this pattern and using .fw_name = "pxo', .name =
> "pxo_board".
We were discussing this to the lcc driver. Problematic topic, yes will
follow the pattern just to not change things.
>
> Same applies to the CXO clock.
>
> > +};
> > +
>
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
--
Ansuel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists