[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 08:22:00 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Jimmy Chen <jinghung.chen3@...mail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
alan-huang@...nta.corp-partner.google.com,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [V1,1/2] arm64: dts: qcom: Add LTE SKUs for
sc7280-villager family
On 07/07/2022 01:40, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Relevant links:
>
> * You saying you liked the enum [1].
> * Me saying I liked them separate and that switching from a
> "description" to a comment was opposite of what Stephen had previous
> voted for [2], but could change if there was overwhelming need to make
> them an enum.
> * Rob saying he prefers an enum but lets sub-arch maintainers decide [3].
> * Bjorn (the sub-arch maintainer) landing the patch without the enum [4].
Ah, so the argument to my comment about using enum was that Bjorn
apparently prefers such way. OK.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists