[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rp5mdq7.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 11:14:24 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V14 03/15] ACPI: irq: Allow acpi_gsi_to_irq() to have an arch-specific fallback
On Sun, 03 Jul 2022 09:45:20 +0100,
Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn> wrote:
>
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
>
> It appears that the generic version of acpi_gsi_to_irq() doesn't
> fallback to establishing a mapping if there is no pre-existing
> one while the x86 version does.
>
> While arm64 seems unaffected by it, LoongArch is relying on the x86
> behaviour. In an effort to prevent new architectures from reinventing
> the proverbial wheel, provide an optional callback that the arch code
> can set to restore the x86 behaviour.
>
> Hopefully we can eventually get rid of this in the future once
> the expected behaviour has been clarified.
>
> Reported-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jianmin Lv <lvjianmin@...ngson.cn>
Same thing about this patch. It is your duty to collect the tags when
you repost a series.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists