[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMzpWsdKYbcu5MxvrAEMLHv4_2OGv2bRYEsQaze5trUSiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2022 13:40:36 +0200
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: correct reference to GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 6:52 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 06 Oct 2021 08:17:38 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 5:00 PM Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Commit 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")
> >> introduces the config symbol GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED, but then
> >> falsely refers to CONFIG_GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED (note the missing LIB
> >> in the reference) in ./include/asm-generic/io.h.
> >>
> >> Luckily, ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py warns on non-existing configs:
> >>
> >> GENERIC_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED
> >> Referencing files: include/asm-generic/io.h
> >>
> >> Correct the name of the config to the intended one.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 527701eda5f1 ("lib: Add a generic version of devmem_is_allowed()")
> >> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks. I'm going to assume this is going in through some other tree,
> but IIUC I sent the buggy patch up so LMK if you're expecting it to go
> through mine.
Palmer, Arnd,
the patch in this mail thread got lost and was not picked up yet.
MAINTAINERS suggests that Arnd takes patches to include/asm-generic/,
since commit 1527aab617af ("asm-generic: list Arnd as asm-generic
maintainer") in 2009, but maybe the responsibility for those files has
actually moved on to somebody (or nobody) else and we just did not
record that yet in MAINTAINERS.
Arnd, will you pick this patch and provide it further to Linus Torvalds?
Otherwise, Palmer already suggested picking it up himself.
Thanks and best regards,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists