linux-kernel - [PATCH] pinctrl: ralink: Check for null return of devm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220710154922.2610876-1-williamsukatube@163.com>
Date:   Sun, 10 Jul 2022 23:49:22 +0800
From:   williamsukatube@....com
To:     arinc.unal@...nc9.com, sergio.paracuellos@...il.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     William Dean <williamsukatube@...il.com>,
        Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@...tino.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: ralink: Check for null return of devm_kcalloc

From: William Dean <williamsukatube@...il.com>

Because of the possible failure of the allocation, data->domains might
be NULL pointer and will cause the dereference of the NULL pointer
later.
Therefore, it might be better to check it and directly return -ENOMEM
without releasing data manually if fails, because the comment of the
devm_kmalloc() says "Memory allocated with this function is
automatically freed on driver detach.".

Fixes: a86854d0c599b ("treewide: devm_kzalloc() -> devm_kcalloc()")
Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@...tino.com>
Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@...il.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c b/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
index 63429a287434..770862f45b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/ralink/pinctrl-ralink.c
@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ static int ralink_pinctrl_pins(struct ralink_priv *p)
 						p->func[i]->pin_count,
 						sizeof(int),
 						GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!p->func[i]->pins)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 		for (j = 0; j < p->func[i]->pin_count; j++)
 			p->func[i]->pins[j] = p->func[i]->pin_first + j;
 
-- 
2.25.1