linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ysv0BEMOmN/WnhVg@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date:   Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:57:24 +0800
From:   Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To:     Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
Cc:     Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        dyoung@...hat.com, vgoyal@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        hpa@...or.com, nramas@...ux.microsoft.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
        robh@...nel.org, efault@....de, rppt@...nel.org, david@...hat.com,
        konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] x86/crash: Add x86 crash hotplug support

On 07/07/22 at 07:55am, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/20/22 00:06, Sourabh Jain wrote:
> > Hello Eric,
> > 
> > On 14/06/22 04:12, Eric DeVolder wrote:
> > > For x86_64, when CPU or memory is hot un/plugged, the crash
> > > elfcorehdr, which describes the CPUs and memory in the system,
> > > must also be updated.
> > > 
> > > When loading the crash kernel via kexec_load or kexec_file_load,
> > > the elfcorehdr is identified at run time in
> > > crash_core:handle_hotplug_event().
> > > 
> > > To update the elfcorehdr for x86_64, a new elfcorehdr must be
> > > generated from the available CPUs and memory. The new elfcorehdr
> > > is prepared into a buffer, and then installed over the top of
> > > the existing elfcorehdr.
> > > 
> > > In the patch 'kexec: exclude elfcorehdr from the segment digest'
> > > the need to update purgatory due to the change in elfcorehdr was
> > > eliminated.  As a result, no changes to purgatory or boot_params
> > > (as the elfcorehdr= kernel command line parameter pointer
> > > remains unchanged and correct) are needed, just elfcorehdr.
> > > 
> > > To accommodate a growing number of resources via hotplug, the
> > > elfcorehdr segment must be sufficiently large enough to accommodate
> > > changes, see the CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES configure item.
> > > 
> > > With this change, crash hotplug for kexec_file_load syscall
> > > is supported. The kexec_load is also supported, but also
> > > requires a corresponding change to userspace kexec-tools.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric DeVolder <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
> > > ---
> > >   arch/x86/Kconfig        |  11 ++++
> > >   arch/x86/kernel/crash.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >   2 files changed, 127 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > index 762a0b6ab8b6..e9eecff3b97d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -2082,6 +2082,17 @@ config CRASH_DUMP
> > >         (CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y).
> > >         For more details see Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst
> > > +config CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES
> > > +    depends on CRASH_DUMP && KEXEC_FILE && (HOTPLUG_CPU || MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
> > > +    int
> > > +    default 32768
> > > +    help
> > > +      For the kexec_file_load path, specify the maximum number of
> > > +      memory regions, eg. as represented by the 'System RAM' entries
> > > +      in /proc/iomem, that the elfcorehdr buffer/segment can accommodate.
> > > +      This value is combined with NR_CPUS and multiplied by Elf64_Phdr
> > > +      size to determine the final buffer size.
> > > +
> > >   config KEXEC_JUMP
> > >       bool "kexec jump"
> > >       depends on KEXEC && HIBERNATION
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > > index 9db41cce8d97..b9cdf7a0d868 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/crash.c
> > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> > >   #include <linux/slab.h>
> > >   #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> > >   #include <linux/memblock.h>
> > > +#include <linux/highmem.h>
> > >   #include <asm/processor.h>
> > >   #include <asm/hardirq.h>
> > > @@ -398,7 +399,17 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
> > >       image->elf_headers = kbuf.buffer;
> > >       image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.bufsz;
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
> > > +    /* Ensure elfcorehdr segment large enough for hotplug changes */
> > > +    kbuf.memsz = (CONFIG_NR_CPUS_DEFAULT + CONFIG_CRASH_MAX_MEMORY_RANGES) * sizeof(Elf64_Phdr);
> > > +    /* For marking as usable to crash kernel */
> > > +    image->elf_headers_sz = kbuf.memsz;
> > > +    /* Record the index of the elfcorehdr segment */
> > > +    image->elfcorehdr_index = image->nr_segments;
> > > +    image->elfcorehdr_index_valid = true;
> > > +#else
> > >       kbuf.memsz = kbuf.bufsz;
> > > +#endif
> > >       kbuf.buf_align = ELF_CORE_HEADER_ALIGN;
> > >       kbuf.mem = KEXEC_BUF_MEM_UNKNOWN;
> > >       ret = kexec_add_buffer(&kbuf);
> > > @@ -413,3 +424,108 @@ int crash_load_segments(struct kimage *image)
> > >       return ret;
> > >   }
> > >   #endif /* CONFIG_KEXEC_FILE */
> > > +
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG)
> > > +int crash_hotplug_support(void) { return 1; }
> > > +void *arch_map_crash_pages(unsigned long paddr, unsigned long size)
> > > +{
> > > +    /*
> > > +     * NOTE: The addresses and sizes passed to this routine have
> > > +     * already been fully aligned on page boundaries. There is no
> > > +     * need for massaging the address or size.
> > > +     */
> > > +    void *ptr = NULL;
> > > +
> > > +    /* NOTE: requires arch_kexec_[un]protect_crashkres() for write access */
> > > +    if (size > 0) {
> > > +        struct page *page = pfn_to_page(paddr >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> > > +
> > > +        ptr = kmap(page);
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    return ptr;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void arch_unmap_crash_pages(void **ptr)
> > > +{
> > > +    if (ptr) {
> > > +        if (*ptr)
> > > +            kunmap(*ptr);
> > > +        *ptr = NULL;
> > > +    }
> > > +}
> > 
> > Aren't arch will have build issue if arch_[un]map_crash_pages methods are not defined?
> Sourabh,
> Yes, you are correct. I'll add __weak versions of each in crash_core.c in the next patch.

Just a reminder, __weak is deprecated and has been cleaned up in
kernel/kexec*.c in below patch.

[PATCH 0/2] kexec: Drop __weak attributes from functions