[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=X2ZfwwDO_hSSN35ObfvBbBbPjMoSB4GvS7m0yJieNg3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 08:11:29 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: constrain reg-names
perp variants
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 7:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2022 16:52, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> The entries in arrays must have fixed order, so the bindings and Linux
> >> driver expecting various combinations of 'reg' addresses was never
> >> actually conforming to guidelines.
> >>
> >> The 'core' reg entry is valid only for SDCC v4 and lower, so disallow it
> >> in SDCC v5. SDCC v4 supports CQE and ICE, so allow them, even though
> >> the qcom,sdhci-msm-v4 compatible is used also for earlier SoCs with SDCC
> >> v2 or v3, so it is not entirely accurate.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changes since v1:
> >> 1. Rework the patch based on Doug's feedback.
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml | 61 ++++++++++++-------
> >> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > In the ${SUBJECT} I'm not sure what a "perp variant" is. Is that a
> > typo or just a phrase I'm not aware of?
>
> Should be:
> "per variants"
>
> >
> >
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >> index fc6e5221985a..2f0fdd65e908 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >> @@ -49,33 +49,11 @@ properties:
> >>
> >> reg:
> >> minItems: 1
> >> - items:
> >> - - description: Host controller register map
> >> - - description: SD Core register map
> >> - - description: CQE register map
> >> - - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >> + maxItems: 4
> >>
> >> reg-names:
> >> minItems: 1
> >> maxItems: 4
> >> - oneOf:
> >> - - items:
> >> - - const: hc
> >> - - items:
> >> - - const: hc
> >> - - const: core
> >> - - items:
> >> - - const: hc
> >> - - const: cqhci
> >> - - items:
> >> - - const: hc
> >> - - const: cqhci
> >> - - const: ice
> >> - - items:
> >> - - const: hc
> >> - - const: core
> >> - - const: cqhci
> >> - - const: ice
> >>
> >> clocks:
> >> minItems: 3
> >> @@ -177,6 +155,43 @@ required:
> >> allOf:
> >> - $ref: mmc-controller.yaml#
> >>
> >> + - if:
> >> + properties:
> >> + compatible:
> >> + contains:
> >> + enum:
> >> + - qcom,sdhci-msm-v4
> >> + then:
> >> + properties:
> >> + reg:
> >> + minItems: 2
> >> + items:
> >> + - description: Host controller register map
> >> + - description: SD Core register map
> >> + - description: CQE register map
> >> + - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >> + reg-names:
> >> + minItems: 2
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: hc
> >> + - const: core
> >> + - const: cqhci
> >> + - const: ice
> >> + else:
> >> + properties:
> >> + reg:
> >> + minItems: 1
> >> + items:
> >> + - description: Host controller register map
> >> + - description: CQE register map
> >> + - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >> + reg-names:
> >> + minItems: 1
> >> + items:
> >> + - const: hc
> >> + - const: cqhci
> >> + - const: ice
> >
> > Do you need to set "maxItems" here? If you don't then will it inherit
> > the maxItems of 4 from above?
>
> No, items determine the size instead.
Can you just remove the "maxItems" from above then? Does it buy us anything?
In any case, with the ${SUBJECT} fixed:
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists