[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g9v35m9vaSeBC19axqRuNqG7qp+AGPn8wRb3Gzn+H9CA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 20:14:03 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...gle.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] PM: hibernate: allow wait_for_device_probe() to
timeout when resuming from hibernation
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:21 PM Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
>
> On 2022/07/11 17:12, Greg KH wrote:
> > creating a
> > locking loop like this should be resolved first,
>
> Rafael and Arjan, can we agree with removing wait_for_device_probe() from snapshot_open() ?
No, we can't.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists