[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32cffa34-1088-5e25-3051-192e3049908f@quicinc.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 13:24:10 +0530
From: Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <quic_srivasam@...cinc.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<dianders@...omium.org>, <judyhsiao@...omium.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<quic_rohkumar@...cinc.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Move wcd specific pin conf
to common file
On 7/8/2022 11:29 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Thanks for your time Stephen!!!
> Quoting Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu (2022-07-07 05:36:21)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-audio-wcd9385.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-audio-wcd9385.dtsi
>> index 32a1e78..859faaa 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-audio-wcd9385.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-audio-wcd9385.dtsi
>> @@ -5,6 +5,70 @@
>> * Copyright (c) 2022, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
>> */
>>
>> +/* PINCTRL */
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic01_clk {
>> + drive-strength = <8>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic01_clk_sleep {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic01_data {
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic23_clk {
>> + drive-strength = <8>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic23_clk_sleep {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_dmic23_data {
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_rx_swr_clk {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + slew-rate = <1>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_rx_swr_clk_sleep {
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_rx_swr_data {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
> I suspect this was discussed before, but why do we need to modify drive
> strengths on pins that aren't in output mode? I assume either rx_swr or
> tx_swr is unidirectional.
Actually this patch is just reorganization only. didn't do any
modification of already reviewed patches.
Will test without drive strength again and post a fix patch post this
patch accepted if required.
>
>> + slew-rate = <1>;
>> + bias-bus-hold;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_rx_swr_data_sleep {
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_tx_swr_clk {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + slew-rate = <1>;
>> + bias-disable;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_tx_swr_clk_sleep {
>> + bias-pull-down;
>> +};
>> +
>> +&lpass_tx_swr_data {
>> + drive-strength = <2>;
>> + slew-rate = <1>;
>> + bias-bus-hold;
>> +};
>> +
>> &mi2s1_data0 {
>> drive-strength = <6>;
>> bias-disable;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists