lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Jul 2022 07:29:06 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>,
        Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] dt-bindings: mmc: sdhci-msm: constrain reg-names
 perp variants

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:02 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2022 17:11, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 7:53 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/07/2022 16:52, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 1:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> The entries in arrays must have fixed order, so the bindings and Linux
> >>>> driver expecting various combinations of 'reg' addresses was never
> >>>> actually conforming to guidelines.
> >>>>
> >>>> The 'core' reg entry is valid only for SDCC v4 and lower, so disallow it
> >>>> in SDCC v5.  SDCC v4 supports CQE and ICE, so allow them, even though
> >>>> the qcom,sdhci-msm-v4 compatible is used also for earlier SoCs with SDCC
> >>>> v2 or v3, so it is not entirely accurate.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes since v1:
> >>>> 1. Rework the patch based on Doug's feedback.
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml    | 61 ++++++++++++-------
> >>>>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> In the ${SUBJECT} I'm not sure what a "perp variant" is. Is that a
> >>> typo or just a phrase I'm not aware of?
> >>
> >> Should be:
> >> "per variants"
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >>>> index fc6e5221985a..2f0fdd65e908 100644
> >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml
> >>>> @@ -49,33 +49,11 @@ properties:
> >>>>
> >>>>    reg:
> >>>>      minItems: 1
> >>>> -    items:
> >>>> -      - description: Host controller register map
> >>>> -      - description: SD Core register map
> >>>> -      - description: CQE register map
> >>>> -      - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >>>> +    maxItems: 4
> >>>>
> >>>>    reg-names:
> >>>>      minItems: 1
> >>>>      maxItems: 4
> >>>> -    oneOf:
> >>>> -      - items:
> >>>> -          - const: hc
> >>>> -      - items:
> >>>> -          - const: hc
> >>>> -          - const: core
> >>>> -      - items:
> >>>> -          - const: hc
> >>>> -          - const: cqhci
> >>>> -      - items:
> >>>> -          - const: hc
> >>>> -          - const: cqhci
> >>>> -          - const: ice
> >>>> -      - items:
> >>>> -          - const: hc
> >>>> -          - const: core
> >>>> -          - const: cqhci
> >>>> -          - const: ice
> >>>>
> >>>>    clocks:
> >>>>      minItems: 3
> >>>> @@ -177,6 +155,43 @@ required:
> >>>>  allOf:
> >>>>    - $ref: mmc-controller.yaml#
> >>>>
> >>>> +  - if:
> >>>> +      properties:
> >>>> +        compatible:
> >>>> +          contains:
> >>>> +            enum:
> >>>> +              - qcom,sdhci-msm-v4
> >>>> +    then:
> >>>> +      properties:
> >>>> +        reg:
> >>>> +          minItems: 2
> >>>> +          items:
> >>>> +            - description: Host controller register map
> >>>> +            - description: SD Core register map
> >>>> +            - description: CQE register map
> >>>> +            - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >>>> +        reg-names:
> >>>> +          minItems: 2
> >>>> +          items:
> >>>> +            - const: hc
> >>>> +            - const: core
> >>>> +            - const: cqhci
> >>>> +            - const: ice
> >>>> +    else:
> >>>> +      properties:
> >>>> +        reg:
> >>>> +          minItems: 1
> >>>> +          items:
> >>>> +            - description: Host controller register map
> >>>> +            - description: CQE register map
> >>>> +            - description: Inline Crypto Engine register map
> >>>> +        reg-names:
> >>>> +          minItems: 1
> >>>> +          items:
> >>>> +            - const: hc
> >>>> +            - const: cqhci
> >>>> +            - const: ice
> >>>
> >>> Do you need to set "maxItems" here? If you don't then will it inherit
> >>> the maxItems of 4 from above?
> >>
> >> No, items determine the size instead.
> >
> > Can you just remove the "maxItems" from above then? Does it buy us anything?
>
> There is no maxItems directly here...

Sorry, I mean above in the schema. After your patch the schema is effectively:

reg:
  minItems: 1
  maxItems: 4
reg-names:
  minItems: 1
  maxItems: 4

...

allOf:
  - if:
      blah-blah-blah
    then:
      properties:
        reg:
          minItems: 2
          items:
            - description: ...
            - description: ...
            - description: ...
            - description: ...
        reg-names:
          blah-blah-blah
    else:
      blah-blah-blah

I'm asking about the maxItems _above_, AKA in the section:

reg:
  minItems: 1
  maxItems: 4
reg-names:
  minItems: 1
  maxItems: 4

Can we remove the "maxItems: 4" from the above and have it just be:

reg:
  minItems: 1
reg-names:
  minItems: 1

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists