[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m28royflc9.fsf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:37:05 +0800
From: Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] sched/rt: fix bad task migration for rt tasks
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2022 09:31:24 +0800
> Schspa Shi <schspa@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> @@ -1998,11 +1998,15 @@ static struct rq *find_lock_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task, struct rq *rq)
>> * the mean time, task could have
>> * migrated already or had its affinity changed.
>> * Also make sure that it wasn't scheduled on its rq.
>> + * It is possible the task was scheduled, set
>> + * "migrate_disabled" and then got preempted, And we
>> + * check task migration disable flag here too.
>
> Nit. "got preempted, so we must check the task migration disable flag here
> too".
>
OK, I will make a upload for this too.
> But other than that.
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
>
>> */
--
BRs
Schspa Shi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists