[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eeed43cf-7bd6-9d77-9e1f-e018a236a058@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 17:59:22 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com
Cc: daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com,
sam@...nborg.org, daniel@...ll.ch, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
vkoul@...nel.org, palmer@...osinc.com, airlied@...ux.ie,
palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, robh+dt@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org, niklas.cassel@....com,
dillon.minfei@...il.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
fancer.lancer@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: add canaan k210
sram controller
On 12/07/2022 17:54, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
> On 11/07/2022 00:21, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 7/11/22 04:39, Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> Damien, Krzysztof,
>>>
>>> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that
>>> long, but this binding is (functionally) unchanged for a few
>>> versions now. Are you happy with this approach Damien?
>>> U-Boot only cares about the compatible & the clocks property,
>>> not the regs etc.
>>>
>>> I (lazily) tested it in U-Boot with the following diff:
>>
>> If both the kernel and u-boot still work as expected with this change, I
>> am OK with it.
>
> It's all yours so Krzysztof :)
It's too late in the cycle for me to pick it up. If you have alternate
tree to take it through, go ahead with:
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Otherwise, I'll take it after the merge window of v5.20, so in ~1 month
according to crystal ball.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists